UAE GovTrust Scope Filtering Gains and Routing Failures in Bilingual Public Service Retrieval 待解读
新用户看这篇论文该怎么开始
- 先点「赞助解读」，AI 会把论文转成可直接执行的行动清单。
- 看完“可执行改进行动”后，可快速决定是否值得立项。
- 用上面的卡片内容直接发给团队，减少重复阅读。
摘要
Public-service queries can mention several locations while only one controls the requested service. We study this distinction in UAE GovTrust, a controlled English-Arabic retrieval diagnostic comprising 22 authored service summaries and 50 scenarios with 110 query variants. Twelve methods separate lexical and dense ranking, rank fusion, scope filtering, a multilingual cross-encoder, and direct service lookup. On 72 matched answerable queries with bilingual evidence, role-filtered reciprocal rank fusion retrieves a relevant first result for 69 queries (95.8%), versus 47 (65.3%) for unfiltered fusion; filtered dense retrieval and direct lookup each achieve 68 (94.4%). With English-only evidence, excluding zero-score lexical candidates raises filtered fusion from 52 to 64 correct first hits. However, the unchanged router selects the correct action and scope for only 2 of 168 post-audit perturbations covering paraphrases, irrelevant facts, negation, and corrections. These perturbations are deliberately authored diagnostics, not held-out evaluation. Fresh-environment execution reproduces all 1,320 original ranking orders and actions. The results show that correct scope metadata can improve ranking while brittle scope inference can remove the evidence needed to answer. The study evaluates retrieval and routing, not generated answers or legal correctness; independent Arabic and domain validation remains necessary.
分析报告
暂无报告。点击“分析”开始生成。
个性化解读 与社区共享解读不同
用自己的话告诉 AI 你想要什么样的解读（比如"用大白话讲给非专业人士听"、"重点分析对我们团队 RAG 系统的可迁移性"），生成一份只属于你自己的版本；生成后也可以选择设为"愿意共享"，被更多人看到、点赞。