Evaluating Cloud and Self-Hosted OCR Systems for Arabic, English, and French Documents: Bounding Box Detection, Text Recognition, and Mathematical Expression Recognition 待解读
新用户看这篇论文该怎么开始
- 先点「赞助解读」，AI 会把论文转成可直接执行的行动清单。
- 看完“可执行改进行动”后，可快速决定是否值得立项。
- 用上面的卡片内容直接发给团队，减少重复阅读。
摘要
Choosing an OCR system for a multilingual archive requires balancing accuracy against deployment constraints. This study compares cloud and self-hosted systems on three tasks: bounding box detection on 48 Arabic, English, and French pages, text recognition on 315 pages across nine document types, and mathematical expression recognition on 83 English and Arabic samples. Detection was assessed by page-level visual grades, text by character error rate (CER) against a Gemini-generated reference transcription, and mathematics by scores against known answers. Main estimates are accompanied by 95% intervals and paired comparisons. Google Document AI and Surya produced Good line boxes on 47 of 48 (98%) and 46 of 48 (96%) pages. Datalab, Azure Document Intelligence, and Document AI had mean CERs of 0.145-0.152, with no difference detected in unadjusted paired comparisons. Surya had the lowest mean CER among self-hosted systems (0.199). No mathematical test had a statistically clear leader. Strict checks showed that near-perfect page scores could conceal a replaced Arabic variable or Eastern Arabic digits rewritten in Western form. Reliable evaluation therefore requires uncertainty estimates, structural checks, and notation-specific tests in addition to aggregate recognition scores.
分析报告
暂无报告。点击“分析”开始生成。
个性化解读 与社区共享解读不同
用自己的话告诉 AI 你想要什么样的解读（比如"用大白话讲给非专业人士听"、"重点分析对我们团队 RAG 系统的可迁移性"），生成一份只属于你自己的版本；生成后也可以选择设为"愿意共享"，被更多人看到、点赞。