ASIL: Replacing Screenshot-and-Click with Structured State and Semantic Actions 待解读

下载

新用户看这篇论文该怎么开始

  1. 先点「赞助解读」,AI 会把论文转成可直接执行的行动清单。
  2. 看完“可执行改进行动”后,可快速决定是否值得立项。
  3. 用上面的卡片内容直接发给团队,减少重复阅读。
先订阅关键词,后续不再手工筛论文

摘要

Powerful code agents can execute scripts, call tools, and manage files, yet many important applications remain accessible primarily through graphical user interfaces. We argue that screenshot-and-click is an inefficient interface for software-operating agents: screenshots are state-incomplete, and GUI actions are brittle, semantically weak, and poorly matched to long-horizon planning. We introduce ASIL (Agent-Software Interaction Layer), an agent-native interface that exposes software through structured JSON observations and code-executable semantic actions, realized through the deepest feasible access path for each application. We instantiate ASIL across 15 applications and a benchmark of 300 single-application and 80 multi-application tasks. ASIL reaches above 80 with closed models while executing fewer than five actions per task. Under a repaired runtime and a 50-step screenshot budget, the same tasks yield 6.6 and 26.6 strict success under screenshot-and-click control, rising to 15.0 and 53.3 on an easier OSWorld-comparable band. Against application-native interfaces on matched tasks, ASIL exceeds LibreOffice's UNO API by 28-38 strict points but only matches draw.io's MCP content contract. The structured modality also suits training: small-scale SFT raises Qwen3.5-2B from 58.0 to 72.1 and Qwen3.5-9B from 66.6 to 80.4, and resource-limited on-policy RL further raises them to 74.4 and 82.2.

分析报告

暂无报告。点击“分析”开始生成。

个性化解读 与社区共享解读不同

用自己的话告诉 AI 你想要什么样的解读(比如"用大白话讲给非专业人士听"、"重点分析对我们团队 RAG 系统的可迁移性"),生成一份只属于你自己的版本;生成后也可以选择设为"愿意共享",被更多人看到、点赞。